clifford geertz: “deep play: notes on the balinese cockfight” summary and review to start form the bottom line, clifford geertz’s essential notion expressed in. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” is one of Clifford Geertz’s most influential articles which illustrates not only the meaning of a given. Perhaps one of the most widely read anthropological essays, “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” by Clifford Geertz is available.
|Published (Last):||1 March 2012|
|PDF File Size:||6.12 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
However the fight, according to Geertz, is not between individuals but is rather a simulation of the social structure of kinship and social groups.
Self-mockery seems to be an essential ingredient for cockfightt an anthropological classic. The first is to draw the audience into the society along with the anthropologist.
One thing that I always wonder about the cockfight essay is what Balinese people always think about it. Like a lot of people I read the Balinese cockfight article in my anthropological youth and I remember enjoying it although the Person, Time, and Conduct essay in that same volume was the one that really captured my attention.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Cockfights are illegal and the sudden appearance of the police during one of the first fights Geertz and his wife witnessed sent everyone scurrying home:.
It is as if everything they do could be considered the basis of a deep play, the only means compatible with their lifestyle and way of thinking. Rola brings up an interesting point. Other than the phenomenon of Hell Houses, the West is bereft whatsoever of significant high stake ventures.
Notes on the Balinese Cockfight” was written It is a society’s manner of speaking to itself about itself, and is therefore of prime interest for the anthropologist. To come round full circle, it may be worth remembering the material and political conditions of fieldwork in the s, 60s and 70s. Sennett — The Craftsman in links, no particular order. That what the cockfight has to say about Bali is not altogether without perception and the disquiet it expresses about the general pattern of Balinese life is not wholly without reason is attested by the fact [what a marvellous example of passive voice and absence of the author] that in two weeks of Decemberduring the upheavals following the unsuccessful coup in Djakarta, between forty and eighty thousand Balinese in a population of about two million were killed, largely by one another—the worst outburst in the country.
Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight – Wikipedia
Subscribe to our mailing list and get the latest news from Garage. Alsia timon February 8, at The Balinese cockfight is, as Geertz puts it, a way of playing with fire without getting burned.
Based on a large pool of observations and interviews, Geertz concludes that the cockfight as a cultural phenomenon offers rich anthropological material for the interpretation of the Balinese society.
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
Doing fieldwork in Taiwan in those years meant, among other things, being constantly aware that certain topics were off-limits. During the s, commentaries on the Balinese cockfight essay have become quite common, developing, for the most part, in apparent independence….
It channels aggression and rivalry into an indirect symbolic sphere of engagement. Fighting always takes place between people and cocks from opposing social groups tje, clan, village etc.
Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight by Clifford Geertz
ANd, of course the fact that we can still develop a pretty hearty discussion suggests that the issues raised by Geertz around the time I was born are still far from totally settled. More Geertz online at HyperGeertz. Cockfighting is a fight for statues, with bets serving only to symbolize the risk.
Following Bentham, Geertz defines a “deep fight” is one in balineee the stakes are so high the people lose their rationality.
In The Interpretation of Cultures Geertz explicitly contrasts his position that symbols are found in public behavior with public meanings to psychological approaches that equate culture with mental models Ward Goodenough or subconscious emotions Culture and Personality studies influenced by Freudthus making culture invisible or a theoretical artifact created by the observer.
Rituals such as the Balinese cockfight, Geertz concludes, are a form of text which can be read.
He persuades me that thick description is better than the thin explanations that anthropologist typically provide but offers no criteria for deciding when one description is better than another.
However, Geertz reminds us, neither winning nor losing in a cockfight can actually change the social status of the participant, remaining but a metaphor of real success of failure. Geertz is therefore as much as an objective observer as one could be, a fact that allows him to notice the subtleties involved in this Balinese pastime and its impact on both the performers and the audience. The experience of hiding from the police in the courtyard of a local couple allowed Geertz to break the tension between himself and the villagers, and perform all of the interviews and observation which make up The Interpretation of Cultures.
The problem is to learn how to read them, not to decipher something else going on behind the scenes. We ran down the main village street, northward, away from where we were living, for we were on that side of the ring.